Re: (erielack) My $.02 worth concerning the recent ELHS rant

[William Shultz <wshultz1_@_twcny.rr.com>]

Kevin,

I will without reservation and categorically state again that I do not 
believe there was any attempt by anyone to not let members ask 
questions. It just didn't turn out the way it was planned. Although I 
will say none of the people I knew that were trying to keep on top of 
how it was to be conducted had any idea of what to expect until it 
happened. For instance, I had no idea Mike Connor was going to moderate 
until I saw it listed as such on the convention flier I received to post 
on the web site. More a matter of poor communication I suspect than 
anything else.

As for membership numbers and a Board member can correct me if I am 
wrong, but if you are a lapsed member and rejoin and you remember what 
your old number was, you can have it back. Otherwise you are assigned 
the next highest, available, unused number.

Regards,

Will Shultz

Kevin DeGroff wrote:

>
> Sounds like there needs to be time set aside at the next convention 
> for discussion like this.  From the sound of
> things, the dissenters showed up in Jamestown but weren't given the 
> stage time to make their points.
>
>
>

------------------------------