[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: (erielack) EL GEs vs EMD/ALCOs
- Subject: Re: (erielack) EL GEs vs EMD/ALCOs
- From: "Paul Brezicki" <doctorpb_@_bellsouth.net>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 05:52:55 -0400
Yes Steve, that's the most graphic indication of how badly EMD stumbled: the
only reason it survived was the need to maintain competition in the new loco
marketplace.
Paul B
At one point in the late 1990s I recall that EMD had but one order for
locomotives on its books at London, Ontario, and the industry quietly
noticed. CIT
bought 1000 SD70Ms for a lease fleet, and soon followed orders from some
big
roads. As it did the '60s when it realized that there needs to be more
than
one builder, the industry began buying EMDs. There needs to be two
builders
to keep a competitive check on prices, so you'll EMD and GE in the
locomotive business until some other builder gets big enough to compete.
Mike Del Vecchio
The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
Sponsored by the ELH&TS
http://www.elhts.org
To Unsubscribe: http://lists.elhts.org/erielackunsub.html
------------------------------