[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
(erielack) Erie photo ID
- Subject: (erielack) Erie photo ID
- From: Dale and Ev SBC <gobills_@_ncweb.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 20:39:15 -0400
- In-Reply-To: <200709280933.l8S9X089037306_@_net.bluemoon.net>
- References: <200709280933.l8S9X089037306_@_net.bluemoon.net>
At 05:33 28-09-2007, you wrote:
>Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:21:56 -0400
>From: "Rich Behrendt" <rbehrendt_@_columbus.rr.com>
>Subject: Re: (erielack) Erie Photo ID (2)
>
>Too wide open an interlocking to be Cleveland, and I don't believe Cleveland
>Union Terminal had this complicated a track arrangement...
>
>Although not too familiar w/how the Erie was routed through Buffalo, my vote
>would be for Chicago...
>
>Rich Behrendt
>ELHS #384
Neither Buffalo nor Cleveland. Chicago south side somewhere would be
my guess. There wasn't much diverting from the Dearborn Station
leads like the CB&Q diverts off the main PRR-GM&O leads.
Dale
The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
Sponsored by the ELH&TS
http://www.elhts.org
To Unsubscribe: http://lists.elhts.org/erielackunsub.html
------------------------------