[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: (erielack) New EL and Erie prototypes!!!!
Yes I for one care far more about EL the DL&W.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 27, 2012, at 2:36 PM, "Paul R. Tupaczewski" <paultup_@_comcast.net> wrote:
>> Ed Montgomery wrote: I'm grateful that they are recognizing
>> their heritage.
>>
>> I would have to say that being grateful might be the
>> appropriate thing. If every historical society is criticizing
>> NS on their choice of roads as the ELHS folks are, then the
>> response on the NS side could easily be NEVER AGAIN!
>>
>> The positive and constructive approach is a simple thank you.
>
>
> My gripe is that THEY HAD ALREADY CHOSEN EL AND ERIE AS THEIR PAINT SCHEMES.
>
> And then a group of DL&W fans apparently lobbied for them to change it - and
> they did, to the detriment of the EL.
>
> I also note that none of the well-known Erie fans on this list have offered
> an opinion either - why should they? :)
>
> Regardless, I have a feeling this EL vs. DL&W scheme issue is not settled
> yet at NS. And I HAVE let them known my appreciation for doing this,
> regardless of what their final decision is. But I'm sure going to provide
> them some other details (from my point of view) why EL should be included. I
> even spent a lot of my time PROVIDING ARTWORK AND DETAILS.
>
> Maybe I'm a bit irked that all my work was usurped by a bunch of people who
> didn't get what THEY wanted?
>
> <rant off>
>
> - Paul
>
>
> The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
> http://EL-List.railfan.net/
> To Unsubscribe: http://Lists.Railfan.net/erielackunsub.html
The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
http://EL-List.railfan.net/
To Unsubscribe: http://Lists.Railfan.net/erielackunsub.html
------------------------------