Re: (erielack) Hummmmmmm-Erie Decapod on passenger

["Hank Sundermeyer" <sunderhj_@_att.net>]

Paul B

My charts indicate that signal bridge is just west of mile 4 and is 
constructed of poured concrete.  If I'm reading the charts correctly, the 
train is EB on track 3.  You can barely make out the distant signals for HX 
further down the tracks.

Regards,
Hank
- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul Brezicki" <doctorpb_@_bellsouth.net>
To: "EL Mailing List" <erielack_@_lists.elhts.org>
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 8:26 AM
Subject: (erielack) Hummmmmmm-Erie Decapod on passenger


> The most remarkable item in the photo is the signal bridge; it's the most 
> unusual one I've ever seen and it alone should pin down the location. The 
> right end was built to accomodate another track, either previously removed 
> or never laid.
>
> Howard, I'm sorry you had to endure the flight delay. Having worked and 
> travelled on passenger trains in the past, I say we lost something 
> valuable when we jettisoned this comfortable and dignified mode of travel. 
> It's been at least 30 years since the "romance" went out of flying, as 
> they say. Nowadays the traveller must endure long lines, body searches, 
> being crammed in like a sardine, getting handed a bag of pretzels instead 
> of a hot meal and hoping that your bankrupt carrier managed to pay it's 
> maintenance people this week. Add to that the knowledge that someone 
> somewhere is plotting to blow you to pieces and you understand why I fly 
> only when absolutely necessary.
>
> Paul B
>
> Well, sitting in the Seattle airport so its off the top of my head (and
> today is NOT the day to try to get anywhere fast), it looks almost like an 
> NYSW
> job, with PB #539 (#?) Stillwell mail-express-combine and those older 
> arch-roof
> stillwells on the end. But it appears to be an Erie commuter  on the
> main--and you probably figured that. I am thinking the date is incorrect, 
> as that
> is most definetly a Decapod.  Now if that was a decade earlier  (1939), it
> might be a bit more explainable, but they did fill in on  passenger and 
> mixed
> trains on occassion.  There is another picture or two  (I think in 
> Carleton, 1970)
> that has a similar train.  Maybe I can look it  up when I get home.
>
> At any rate, I'm betting the passengers got to where they were going a lot
> faster than I'm making any headway herre. Oh, yes, I went from Newark to
> Seattle  to get to Montana--today's efficiencies.
>
> Howard Haines
>
>
> The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
> Sponsored by the ELH&TS
> http://www.elhts.org 


	The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
	Sponsored by the ELH&TS
	http://www.elhts.org

------------------------------