Re: Subject: Re:(erielack) New EL and Erie prototypes!!!!

[Rick Barnes <rbarnes803_@_verizon.net>]

It probably has to do with more of a system wide

running area.  NS has most of the Southern Tier.

Richard

On 2/17/2012 6:48 PM, John Adams wrote:
> They don't own any Lackawanna trackage of significance
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Walter W. Stumpf Jr. Sent: Friday, 
> February 17, 2012 8:18 AM To: erielack_@_lists.railfan.net Subject: 
> Subject: Re:(erielack) New EL and Erie prototypes!!!!
>
> I guess the omission of Lackawanna is because NS doesn't run on any 
> ex-DL&W
> track?
>
> NJT does.
>
> Randy Brown
>
>
>
> But they do run over old Lackawanna tracks, at least I see them on the
> Washington to Hackettstown, and probably before and after that leg, which
> was DL&W.
>
> Maybe an oversight that they thought EL would cover?  Or maybe there 
> was a
> minimum track mileage involved and DL&W didnt make the cut?  Maybe we 
> could
> start an online petition to ask them to add a 19th [as they do have more
> GE's coming]?
>
> Walter
>
>
> The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
> http://EL-List.railfan.net/
> To Unsubscribe: http://Lists.Railfan.net/erielackunsub.html
>
>
>     The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
>     http://EL-List.railfan.net/
>     To Unsubscribe: http://Lists.Railfan.net/erielackunsub.html
>


	The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
	http://EL-List.railfan.net/
	To Unsubscribe: http://Lists.Railfan.net/erielackunsub.html

------------------------------